John Lennox refuting the atheist

I want to make the reader aware of John Lennox, an excellent Christian apologist and debater and author of several books, such as God's Undertaker among others, see:

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&sort=relevancerank&search-alias=books&field-author=John%20Lennox

Lennox recently debated the radical evolutionist and atheist Richard Dawkins and did a fairly good job in representing the Christian faith and view.

Lennox blog can be seen here: http://johnlennox.org/

Personally I find the atheist position extremely weak, dishonest and selective.

I can't help referring to Richard Carrier's methodology that only non-theist scientists can be considered as reliable, since they are non-theists, a claim which proves utterly devestating for the integrity of atheist reasoning; see

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/ten.html

Here I guess theists show much more virtue than the majority of radical atheist, a point which Lennox himself brings up:

http://johnlennox.org/index.php/en/resource/limitations_of_science/

Here is also a list from youtube on the famous particular blunder of Richard Dawkins to respond to a simple question related to DNA, which is foundational for his evolutionary view and theory:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJMp6p3tLj4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uz1CiDDIq4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZoMnz9JgGI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o57VUdQoPr4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W4e4MwogLo&feature=related

Of particular interest is this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_s9oKio-fEU&annotation_id=annotation_817251&feature=iv

I did read the book in which Richard Dawkins refers to this particular incident prior to our privilege of Youtube; great actually to watch the interview and the reaction of our atheist friends. You will find it interesting from these youtube videos that it is becoming more and more of an atheist claim that theists fabricate or corrupt interview records, which is a desparate claim indeed. Quite similar to the reaction we had to Antony Flew's conversion from atheism to theism or deism.

Well it seems that Dawkins confirms that the recording was not tampered with. Hence he was stuck when a fundamental question and issue was raised and funny Dawkins has failed to adequately address this issue with anything that impresses a mind that actually conforms to actual reason.

In any case the evolution theory is hardly an adequate refutation of either the Bible (according to some) or God (and I personally hold to the creationist view).